Articles of Confederation Revolutionary War Essay Sample free essay sample

Ever since the Revolutionary war. America had become an independent state. Of class. they needed a national authorities to maintain things in order. So so. the Articles of Confederation was created as the first effort of a national authorities. In a alliance. the provinces. maintain their sovereignty. but they join together in a co-ordinated manner to cover with certain issues. This independency of each political province is seen as the chief advantage and chief disadvantage of a alliance. Ever since the Articles of Confederation. many jobs had occurred. For illustration. there were a batch of dept jobs. Such as paying back the loans authorities had borrowed. and the money to maintain a standing ground forces. Besides each province had merely had one ballot. and that each province had to hold for a jurisprudence to be passed. So at that place wasn’t truly a distribution for voting power. But in malice of all the jobs. We will write a custom essay sample on Articles of Confederation: Revolutionary War Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page the Articles of Confederation did hold some successes. In this instance. it was the Land Ordinance of 1785 and the Northwest Ordinance. which created territorial authorities. Therefore. the Articles of Confederation wasn’t that effectual. but in some affair was effectual in work outing the jobs that confronted the new state. One ground that the Articles of Confederation were non effectual in work outing the jobs is that. it didn’t allow the national authorities revenue enhancement. The authorities can’t back up the state. if it didn’t have the ability to put revenue enhancements on imported goods. For illustration. there were many Americans who had fought during the war. and supplied goods to the ground forces. They were given loan certifications which had made them wait. where shortly the Congress can pay them back. but they failed. The Congress had owed 34 million to Americans and 10 million to foreign leaders. The small money that the Congress made went to foreign leaders. But the Americans still had to wait with the certifications. To work out the job. it was requested that there should be 5 percent revenue enhancement on goods. so they can do more money. But under the Articles of Confederation. the jurisprudence is that every province had to hold. for the jurisprudence to be pas sed. Even the bulk had voted yes. Rhode Island was the lone province. out of 13 provinces. that had disagreed to this petition. so the jurisprudence couldn’t base on balls. Therefore. the state had become truly imbalanced. and unstable. Another job was that the deficiency of soldiers. the United States had. Due to the weak fundss. and the small power the Congress had. the Continental ground forces wasn’t treated that great. Under the Articles of Confederation. the Congress had the authorization to organize a Navy. and the provinces could build up ships to contend privateness. Congress could besides set up an ground forces. but it had to establish on province population and apportioned by province population. Therefore jobs emerged. There was nutrient and vesture lacking. and fillips and rewards promised to the soldiers were neer to the full paid. The Congress had promised to allow them a life long pension bing half there pat one time the war was over. but the promise was broken. By cause of all these jobs. everything had led to Americans military force merely holding fewer than 700 soldiers. In kernel. the national motion couldn’t truly assist. because of the fiscal jobs. Even though the under the Articles of Confederation. United States had witnessed many jobs. it still had a few successes. In this instance. the passing of Ordinance of 1785 and the Northwest Ordinance. Congress had passed the Land Ordinance of 1785 to set up order in the West. The regulation had arranged that new western towns were to be 30 six stat mis square. with one square stat mi set aside for schools. All public lands were to auctioned off to the highest bidders. turn outing all Americans the opportunity to migrate and settle in the West. The Congress had later passed the Northwest Regulation of 1787 to set up a procedure for acknowledging these districts to the Union as provinces. Each district was to be governed by Congress until it had 5. 000 free while male. Then colonists could vote whether to go a lasting province on equal as all the other provinces in the Union. Therefore it was a success towards the state because both regulations had created territorial authorities. put up protocols for the admittance of new provinces. the division of land into utile units. and set aside land in each township for public usage. The Unites provinces cardinal authorities was truly weak under the Articles of Confederation. Even if it had successes such as the Land Ordinance and the Northwest Ordinance. there were more failings than successes. The state had been traveling through many jobs like. non being able to revenue enhancement. They had problem paying back foreign loaners. and some Americans. Besides they couldn’t maintain a strong standing ground forces because of the manner they got treated. hardly any nutrient and apparels. due to fiscal jobs. The authorities was unstable. imbalanced. and out of topographic point. Many people began to protest. but the National authorities couldn’t do anything. So earlier or subsequently. due to the fact of fright of rebellions caused by the people. the Articles of Confederation was shortly replaced by the Constitution. Therefore the Articles of Confederation weren’t as effectual in work outing the jobs the state had.

buy custom Great Leaders essay

buy custom Great Leaders essay Charlemagne and Augustus Caesar are two great names in the history of men. Their achievement and accomplishment is far from emulation. They have left a mark in the history for what they did are worth to be remembered forever. It has been said that these two great men were considered as two great leaders that the mankind has ever produced. However, much we know of them is more on the fact that they were not contemporaries and we tend to separate one another. It is the now the purpose of this essay to present that the two great men of history namely, Charlemagne and Caesar Augustus, do have similarities and some extent of deviation from one another. The main reference of this essay is the Life of Charlemagne by Einhard and and Augustus Caesars Res Gestae Divi Augusti, in "Discovering the Western Past". To proceed I would like to cite specific satge in our two great mens lives as societys highest leader and how are they similar and how do they differ in that specific stage. The accession to the throne In order to start this essay, let me begin by describing how Charlemagne and Caesar Augustus ascend to the throne fit for a king. What have they done to deserve such honor and title? Is the born innate to them since the day theyre born? Or had they work for it? The Augustus Caesars Res Gestae Divi Augusti had revealed that Caesar Augustus ascended to the throne by working on it and gaining the peoples trust specially those who compose the council. Thus, Caesar assumed the highest office through public approval which was after he had proven his worth as a leader. While Einhard revealed that Charlemagne inherited the throne from his father. But whichever reason paved the way to the throne for these two great men, I think that the two texts both agreed that Charlemagne and Caesar Augustus both proven and shown their capacity and worth as the highest leader of their country in their times. On war and in pursuit of kingdom expansion As a leader on those times of Charlemagne and Caesar Augustus, one main concern of the state is to protect the state from being invaded by other expanding state and to expanding by invading other states. Thus army and defenses were priorities of the state during that time.Just like Caesar Augustus, Charlemagne had done this army thing. He managed to led his army against different foes and he emerged victorious. Thus, during his time, there is apparent expansion of the state. More properties were grabbed. Many resources were gained. Through this,the state became richer and richer than ever. According to the two texts which is the Life of Charlemagne and Augustus Caesars Res Gestae Divi Augusti showed the greatness of the two in terms of facing war and making tough decisions when a need arises. The two great leaders had a clear program on what to extend, why extending land and the ways and means to implement such program. Einhard clearly expressed the aggressiveness of Charlemagne in war. He did not mention that Charlemagne take a second thought in his participation in war. Hes confident in every war hes into and he took sure steps. Hes ambitious in expanding his territory. Just like Charlemagne, Caesar Augustus seemed to be ambitious too in expanding his kingdom. However, Caesar sought peace in his war. It is evident in his writings, I extended the frontiers of all the provinces.I restored peace to Gallic and Spanish provinces. Charlemagne too created an atmosphere of peace in his territory since he tried to settle public and political dispute by letting the captives choose, death or Christianity. On public and social works Leader as they were, theyre ought to perform social task that will bring forth benefit for the people. They must fulfill their duty in caring and giving whats best for his society. Thus, Charlemagne and Caesar Augustus were subject to social and political responsibilities and obligations. Einhard mentioned that Charlemagne although occupied by the thought of subduing the other nations, he had devised plans about programs that will benefit his constituents and some were completed. These projects range from bridges to landmarks and basilicas. While Caesar Augustus focused on sensible games of Olympics and honoring such using his name. thus Augustus concerns more in improving physical aspect of public life. He is more concern of amusement. Although being more focus in the Olympics and the development of physical prowess, Augustus took time in managing the engineering of different structures that became the landmarks of the ancient Rome. Thus, we here the similarity of the two in giving time for public works but Augustus focus more on amusements and the development of physical prowess of his constituent. On democracy Let us be aware that the contemporary of Augustus is the birth of the concept of democracy and Augustus was completely aware of that. He completely understands that his power emanates from the voice of people who voted him thus he was well guuided throughout his reign that no one stood higher than the mass who elected him. Thus, a primary concept of democracy was visible in Augustus leadership. One event that provides the proof that Augustus was indeed a democratic leader is that he transferred his power to Roman senate and people. This action is greatly a breakthrough in other astronomical studies. Unlike Caesar Augustus, Charlemagnes reign is a monarchial format where there is only one leader in the group and all decision emanates from her. This is due to the fact that democracy that time is not popular and just a fresh idea that needs to be tested. Thus, many have doubted that album. Conclusion: Einhards depiction of Charlemagnes life and leadership skills contains similarities and some differences with how Caesar Augustus described his character in his Caesars Res Gestae Divi Augusti. And I would like to sum up the similarities and differences of two great men ever written in pages of history. In order to present this MCQ, allow me to deliver this in numbered form. The two leaders share a common thirst. A thirst for territorial expansion. As a result, they have used war as a tool in attaining this goal. However, Augustus considers establishing peace in different provinces where civil disputes occur. The two leaders provided public works which involves building infrastructure which will benefit the society where theyre living. However, August put more emphasis in public entertainment and to the development of physical prowess among its faculty. Charlemagnes leadership is more on monarchial while Augustus performance is very good and he is more adapting the democracy way of teaching. Comparing the two great leaders in history will leave us a question, who is the better of the two? Which leader did more in the society? Let us recall that the two leaders were born in different time frame with different existing social condition. It is said that Charlemagne did small things compare to Caesars achievement. Let us note that during Charlemagnes regime, the civilization is still at low. Only few were given a chance to educate themselves. Unlike during Caesars time, the civilization is at top or high level of literacy and mental activities are present. We cannot compare whose contribution is best since each contribution is serving the very purpose of the time it was served. Buy custom Great Leaders essay

Criminolgy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Criminolgy - Essay Example Drugs alter a person’s behavior. Depending on the user it may cause violence. Sometimes this violence leads to illegal activity. A drug user’s only objective at times is to get money for drugs by any means necessary. Some of the drug related crimes are larceny, armed burglary, assault, motor vehicle theft, robbery, possession or sale of drugs and drunken law violations. Gangs are majorly affiliated with drugs. The National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Arrestee Drug Abuse monitoring program measures drug use among arrestees with positive urine tests for drug use (Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2009). Data is collected voluntarily and anonymously at the time of arrest in jails. Data from males arrested showed that 42.5 to 78.7 percent tested positive for drugs (Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2009). Female who tested positive for drugs ranged from 33.3 to 82.1 percent (Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2009). Males arrested charged with drug possession or sales were among the most likely to test positive for drug use, while female arrestees charged with prostitution, drug possession or sales were among the most likely to show a positive test result In 1997 the U.S. bureau of the census conducted surveys of state and federal prisons. About 22.4 to 32.6 percent of inmates arrested reported being under the influence of drugs at the time of their offense, 20 to 27 percent stated that they committed their crime to obtain money to buy drugs (Gargaro, 1999). The increase in the lethal weapons on the street has also contributed to drug violence. Out of 14,088 homicides in 1998 4.8 percent were drug related accorded to FBI crime stats (Gargaro, 1999). Guns, knives, and other weapons are used in armed robberies, enforcing drug deals, and for respect on the streets. Weapons and drugs are two entities that are found together. Liberals and